From: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
To: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley@gmail.com>,
Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>, selinux <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: noisy selinux messages on tmpfs mount.
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:47:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B03E45.8000106@tycho.nsa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150109191329.GA19400@codemonkey.org.uk>
On 01/09/2015 02:13 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 08:06:49AM -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Thursday, January 08, 2015 02:34:57 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> > >> On Thursday, January 08, 2015 02:08:22 PM Dave Jones wrote:
> > >> > systemd has started mounting a tmpfs in /run/user/<uid> every time a
> > >> > session begins. So after ssh'ing into a box a number of times, dmesg
> > >> > looks like this..
> > >> >
> > >> > [...] SELinux: initialized (dev tmpfs, type tmpfs), uses transition SIDs
> > >> > [...] SELinux: initialized (dev tmpfs, type tmpfs), uses transition SIDs
> > >>
> > >> {snip}
> > >>
> > >> > What's a good solution to stopping this spew ? printk_once doesn't seem
> > >> > like a good fit, in case someone is doing different labelling behaviours
> > >> > between mounts.
> > >> >
> > >> > Could we only print it if the mount is being done with non-default
> > >> > behaviour perhaps?
> > >>
> > >> I'm very curious to hear Stephen's opinion on the issue, but I wonder how
> > >> much this would honestly impact us if we removed this message in the case
> > >> where we mount the filesystem with a known labeling behavior.
> >
> > We already reduced that message to KERN_DEBUG. Is that not sufficient?
>
> That doesn't really help with the flooding of dmesg, so no.
> I should also note that it's not just logging in that creates a new
> session, it also seems to be getting triggered by cron jobs, or
> whatever the systemd replacement is.
Fair enough. I think we can likely get rid of it then.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-09 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-08 19:08 noisy selinux messages on tmpfs mount Dave Jones
2015-01-08 19:34 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-08 19:38 ` Dave Jones
2015-01-08 19:39 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-09 13:06 ` Stephen Smalley
2015-01-09 19:13 ` Dave Jones
2015-01-09 20:47 ` Stephen Smalley [this message]
2015-01-12 14:51 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2015-01-12 15:06 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-12 15:53 ` Stephen Smalley
2015-01-09 20:55 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-09 21:01 ` Dominick Grift
2015-01-10 3:12 ` Paul Moore
2015-01-10 9:11 ` Dominick Grift
2015-01-10 9:24 ` Dominick Grift
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B03E45.8000106@tycho.nsa.gov \
--to=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=stephen.smalley@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox