linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Imre Palik <imrep.amz@gmail.com>,
	<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: "Palik, Imre" <imrep@amazon.de>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-time: decreasing the rating of the xen clocksource below that of the tsc clocksource for dom0's
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:52:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B4EAC7.2080105@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421136862-15083-1-git-send-email-imrep.amz@gmail.com>

On 13/01/15 08:14, Imre Palik wrote:
> From: "Palik, Imre" <imrep@amazon.de>
> 
> In Dom0's the use of the TSC clocksource (whenever it is stable enough to
> be used) instead of the Xen clocksource should not cause any issues, as
> Dom0 VMs never live-migrated.  The TSC clocksource is somewhat more
> efficient than the Xen paravirtualised clocksource, thus it should have
> higher rating.
> 
> This patch decreases the rating of the Xen clocksource in Dom0s to 275.
> Which is half-way between the rating of the TSC clocksource (300) and the
> hpet clocksource (250).

I'm happy with this but would like to see acks from those who objected
to v1.

David

> --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> @@ -487,6 +487,10 @@ static void __init xen_time_init(void)
>  	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	struct timespec tp;
>  
> +	/* As Dom0 is never moved, no penalty on using TSC there */
> +	if (xen_initial_domain())
> +		xen_clocksource.rating = 275;
> +
>  	clocksource_register_hz(&xen_clocksource, NSEC_PER_SEC);
>  
>  	if (HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_stop_periodic_timer, cpu, NULL) == 0) {
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-13  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-13  8:14 [PATCH] xen-time: decreasing the rating of the xen clocksource below that of the tsc clocksource for dom0's Imre Palik
2015-01-13  9:52 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2015-01-13 15:42   ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2015-01-13 16:07     ` David Vrabel
2015-01-13 16:17       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-01-13 16:33         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-01-14 14:21           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-01-20 19:21 ` David Vrabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B4EAC7.2080105@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=imrep.amz@gmail.com \
    --cc=imrep@amazon.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).