From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932201AbbAOVdV (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:33:21 -0500 Received: from mail-bn1bon0134.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.111.134]:46496 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932157AbbAOVdS (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:33:18 -0500 X-WSS-ID: 0NI8MJD-07-6E2-02 X-M-MSG: Message-ID: <54B8320C.5090201@amd.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:33:00 -0600 From: Suravee Suthikulanit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hanjun Guo , Catalin Marinas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Olof Johansson" , Arnd Bergmann , Mark Rutland , Grant Likely , Will Deacon CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Graeme Gregory , Sudeep Holla , Jon Masters , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , Bjorn Helgaas , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Robert Richter , Randy Dunlap , , , Timur Tabi , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/17] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 References: <1421247905-3749-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <1421247905-3749-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is 165.204.84.221) smtp.mailfrom=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:165.204.84.221;CTRY:US;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(428002)(479174004)(377454003)(24454002)(199003)(164054003)(51704005)(189002)(36756003)(92566002)(76176999)(87266999)(54356999)(23746002)(1720100001)(46102003)(65956001)(65806001)(120886001)(86362001)(83506001)(77096005)(97736003)(15975445007)(68736005)(101416001)(33656002)(59896002)(2950100001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(106466001)(50466002)(87936001)(50986999)(65816999)(77156002)(47776003)(62966003)(64706001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:BLUPR02MB195;H:atltwp01.amd.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en; X-DmarcAction-Test: None X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(3005004);SRVR:BLUPR02MB195; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004);SRVR:BLUPR02MB195; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0457F11EAF X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR02MB195; X-OriginatorOrg: amd4.onmicrosoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jan 2015 21:33:15.0270 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: fde4dada-be84-483f-92cc-e026cbee8e96 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=fde4dada-be84-483f-92cc-e026cbee8e96;Ip=[165.204.84.221] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR02MB195 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/14/2015 9:04 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > Hi, > > This is the v7 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 > > updates from v6: > - Rebased on top of 3.19-rc4, add Mack Salter's patch to use > the early_ioremap after paging_init() for ACPI table mappings; > > - Two patches about converting apic_id to phys_id to make it arch > agnostic were already merged into RC4 by Rafael. > > - Split patch "Parse FADT table to get PSCI flags for PSCI init" > into two as Lorenzo's suggestion, also fix typo and lack of __init > for psci_0_2_set_functions() which is spotted by Lorenzo. > > - Add Tested-by from Yijing Wang. > > previous version is here: > v6: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/4/40 > > 1. Why we need ACPI on ARM64? > > - Grant already posted a blog about this, and stated clearly > why we need ACPI on ARM64: > > http://www.secretlab.ca/archives/151 > > > 2. What we need to do before the arm64 ACPI core patches > could be merged into the kernel? > > - Al Stone posted a TODO list and updates v2 for the > progress we made: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg390069.html > > - so from the progress we can see that we already finished > most of the items, and _OSI we got a plan to fix it, RFC > patch is on the way. > > > This patch set was tested on FVP by Fuwei, and booted ok as expected. > (No functional change since last version) > > Thanks > Hanjun > The V7 patch series has also been re-tested on AMD Seattle server platform along with the "Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver" patch series here (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/5/662). Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit Thanks, Suravee