From: Piotr Karbowski <piotr.karbowski@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] rename() from outside of the target dir breaks /proc exe symlink.
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:25:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B957B5.8000202@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54A329C1.9030704@gmail.com>
On 12/30/2014 11:40 PM, Piotr Karbowski wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On 12/27/2014 07:14 PM, Al Viro wrote:
>> That's because it never _had_ worked. Note that opening the damn thing
>> will give the right file - it does not work by traversing the result of
>> readlink(2). readlink(2) output on those is not promised to be useful
>> in all cases; often enough it is, but it won't work on cross-directory
>> renames, it can't be used to tell a filename that really ends with "
>> (deleted)"
>> from a removed file, etc. Moreover, it only very recently became
>> usable for
>> victim names with the last component longer than 40 characters if you
>> did an
>> overwriting rename.
>>
>> What are you trying to use it for?
>
> I am using it to track the origin of running processes. I am working
> with continuous integration of a Linux embedded software. The tests goes
> in Linux containers, multiple instances of binary with the same name in
> a single container/namespace, all with cwd symlink pointing to / which
> looks from outside virtually the same, the binaries are modified at
> runtime by coping, modifing and replacing for another execution of the
> same binary (using patchelf to add additional NEEDED to header or change
> rpath or dynamic loader and such).
>
> In my very usecase, the exe symlink is essential.
*Friendly bump*
Can anything be done about it or is there any other mechanism that I
could use to get origin of the running binary?
-- Piotr.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-16 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-27 17:39 [BUG] rename() from outside of the target dir breaks /proc exe symlink Piotr Karbowski
2014-12-27 18:14 ` Al Viro
2014-12-30 22:40 ` Piotr Karbowski
2015-01-16 18:25 ` Piotr Karbowski [this message]
2015-02-09 18:18 ` [BUMP] " Piotr Karbowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B957B5.8000202@gmail.com \
--to=piotr.karbowski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox