From: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to handle access to multiple PHYs through MDIO
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:12:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B9D329.2050201@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B9BF16.2020608@gmail.com>
On 1/16/2015 5:47 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> On 16/01/15 17:10, Ray Jui wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Our SoC, Cygnus, uses a generic MDC/MDIO controller to talk to various
>> PHYs, including 2 x Ethernet GPHY, 2 x PCIe Serdes, and 3 x USB PHYs. In
>> this case, how should I work out a generic PHY driver to handle this?
>
> Interesting, I have typically seen separate MDIO controllers for at
> least Ethernet and USB/PCIe/SATA.
>
>>
>> I notice that most generic PHY drivers are in drivers/phy/*, but
>> Ethernet seems to have its own interface of talking to a PHY through
>> MDIO (drivers/net/phy/*).
>
> That's right, the Ethernet PHY library predates the generic PHY library
> from Kishon and they have little to no common ground.
>
>>
>> I need a single driver to handle these so there isn't any race condition
>> for this single MDIO access in our system.
>
> How about the following design:
>
> - you create a MDIO bus controller library in e.g:
> drivers/phy/cygnus-mdio.c which offers generic generic read/write
> operations with a prototype looking like this:
>
> int mdio_read(void *device, enum device_type, int reg, int addr);
> - int mdio_write(void *device, enum device_type, int reg, int addr, int
> value)
> - where device_type is MDIO_DEV_SERDES or MDIO_DEV_GPHY
>
> - these reads and writes are protected by a local spinlock which is not
> exposed to the caller, it just needs to know that it gets serialized
> access to the controller
>
> - you write a MDIO controller in drivers/phy/ for the USB and PCIe PHYs
> which uses this library and interfaces with Kishon's PHY Library operations
>
> - you create a MDIO bus controller driver in drivers/net/phy/ which also
> uses this library and registers with Linux using mdiobus_register()
>
> This is imho the easiest way to achieve what you want here, however, you
> could also stash all of what I describe above in a single MDIO bus
> driver in drivers/phy/ and ifdef out what is relevant based on your
> kernel configuration, up to you, there could be some tricky dependencies
> to solve though.
>
Thanks, Florian. This makes sense to me.
Note this means I'll need to create public headers under include/linux
for the mdio library. But yes, having a shared mdio library and
protected with spinlock is the only way to guarantee serialized access
to the mdio controller.
Ray
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-17 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-17 1:10 How to handle access to multiple PHYs through MDIO Ray Jui
2015-01-17 1:47 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-01-17 3:12 ` Ray Jui [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B9D329.2050201@broadcom.com \
--to=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox