From: Zhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <morgan.wang@huawei.com>, <josh@freedesktop.org>,
<paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <dzickus@redhat.com>,
<dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Subject: RCU CPU stall console spews leads to soft lockup disabled is reasonable ?
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:07:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BCBB33.6060608@huawei.com> (raw)
Hi,
On my x86_64 qemu virtual machine, RCU CPU stall console spews may
lead to soft lockup disabled.
If softlockup_thresh > rcu_cpu_stall_timeout (softlockup_thresh = 2 * watchdog_thresh):
/ #
/ # busybox cat /sys/module/rcupdate/parameters/rcu_cpu_stall_timeout
21
/ # echo 60 > /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh
/ # busybox insmod softlockup_test.ko
[ 44.959044] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=21002 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 44.959044] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 107.964045] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=84007 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 107.964045] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 170.969060] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=147012 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 170.969060] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 233.974057] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=210017 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 233.974057] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 296.979059] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=273022 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 296.979059] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 359.984058] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=336027 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 359.984058] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 422.989059] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=399032 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 422.989059] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 485.994056] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=462037 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 485.994056] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 548.999059] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=525042 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 548.999059] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 612.004061] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=588047 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 612.004061] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 675.009058] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=651052 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 675.009058] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
If softlockup_thresh < rcu_cpu_stall_timeout:
/ #
/ # busybox cat /sys/module/rcupdate/parameters/rcu_cpu_stall_timeout
21
/ # echo 5 > /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh
/ # busybox insmod softlockup_test.ko
[ 38.450061] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [busybox:53]
[ 52.450061] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [busybox:53]
[ 66.450073] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [busybox:53]
[ 80.450060] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [busybox:53]
[ 94.450061] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [busybox:53]
The softlockup_test.ko source code is:
//
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
static int hello_start(void)
{
DEFINE_SPINLOCK(hello_lock);
spin_lock_init(&hello_lock);
spin_lock(&hello_lock);
spin_lock(&hello_lock);
return 0;
}
static int __init test_init(void)
{
hello_start();
printk(KERN_INFO "Module init\n");
return 0;
}
static void __exit test_exit(void)
{
printk(KERN_INFO "Module exit!\n");
}
module_init(test_init)
module_exit(test_exit)
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
//
My kernel version is v3.10.63, and i checked the kernel source code,
update_process_times
-> run_local_timers
-> hrtimer_run_queues
-> __run_hrtimer
-> watchdog_timer_fn
-> is_softlockup
-> rcu_check_callbacks
-> __rcu_pending
-> check_cpu_stall
-> print_cpu_stall
If softlockup_thresh > rcu_cpu_stall_timeout, print_cpu_stall will print log to serial port.
The 8250 serial driver will call serial8250_console_write => touch_nmi_watchdog() which reset
watchdog_touch_ts to 0. So the softlockup will not be triggered.
Is this reasonable? Why?
If it is not reasonable, we should adjust the printk loglevel from *KERN_ERR* to *KERN_INFO*
in print_cpu_stall.
next reply other threads:[~2015-01-19 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-19 8:07 Zhang Zhen [this message]
2015-01-19 8:42 ` RCU CPU stall console spews leads to soft lockup disabled is reasonable ? Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-19 9:04 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-19 11:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-20 3:17 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-20 3:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-19 14:06 ` Don Zickus
2015-01-20 3:09 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-20 15:25 ` Don Zickus
2015-01-21 2:26 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-21 3:13 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-21 6:54 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-21 7:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-21 7:25 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-21 9:05 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-21 10:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-21 11:11 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-21 20:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-21 15:10 ` Don Zickus
2015-01-21 20:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-22 3:08 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-22 5:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54BCBB33.6060608@huawei.com \
--to=zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=josh@freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morgan.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).