From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752891AbbATDea (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:34:30 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:64550 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752219AbbATDe2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:34:28 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,431,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="514631921" Message-ID: <54BDCCC0.2080805@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:34:24 +0800 From: "Fu, Zhonghui" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kalle Valo , Arend van Spriel CC: brudley@broadcom.com, Franky Lin , meuleman@broadcom.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, pieterpg@broadcom.com, hdegoede@redhat.com, wens@csie.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation References: <54B36C88.3030609@linux.intel.com> <54B39B59.8000907@broadcom.com> <877fwotddy.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <877fwotddy.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2015/1/15 20:52, Kalle Valo wrote: > Arend van Spriel writes: > >> On 01/12/15 07:41, Fu, Zhonghui wrote: >>> From 8685c3c2746b4275fc808d9db23c364b2f54b52a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Zhonghui Fu >>> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:25:46 +0800 >>> Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation >>> >>> WiFi chip has 2 SDIO functions, and PM core will trigger >>> twice suspend/resume operations for one WiFi chip to do >>> the same things. This patch avoid this case. >>> >>> Acked-by: Arend van Spriel >>> Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov >>> Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu >> This patch needs to be rebased. >> >> Kalle, >> >> Please drop this one. > Ok, dropped. I'll wait for the rebase. I have re-based this patch and sent it in another mail with the same subject. Thanks, Zhonghui >