From: Andrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@ispras.ru>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/module.c: Free lock-classes if parse_args failed
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:47:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BE082A.20207@ispras.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87iog2arfk.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
20.01.2015 9:37, Rusty Russell пишет:
> Andrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@ispras.ru> writes:
>> parse_args call module parameters' .set handlers, which may use locks defined in the module.
>> So, these classes should be freed in case parse_args returns error(e.g. due to incorrect parameter passed).
> Thanks, this seems right. Applied.
>
> But this makes me ask: where is lockdep_free_key_range() called on the
> module init code? It doesn't seem to be at all...
As I understand, locks are not allowed to be defined in the module init
section. So, no needs to call lockdep_free_key_range() for it.
This has a sense: objects from that section are allowed to be used only
by module->init() function. But a single function call doesn't require
any synchronization wrt itself.
If it helps, I used module below for verify effect of the patch:
test.c:
---
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
MODULE_AUTHOR("Tsyvarev Andrey");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
static DEFINE_MUTEX(mutex_main);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(mutex_param);
static int param_set(const char* val, const struct kernel_param* kp)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex_param); //Use mutex defined in the module
mutex_unlock(&mutex_param);
return -EINVAL; // Setting this parameter is always invalid
}
static struct kernel_param_ops param_ops =
{
.set = param_set
};
module_param_cb(param, ¶m_ops, NULL, S_IRUGO);
static int minit(void)
{
mutex_lock(&mutex_main); // Use another mutex
mutex_unlock(&mutex_main);
return 0;
}
static void mexit(void)
{
}
module_init(minit);
module_exit(mexit);
--
insmod test.ko param=1 # Will fail
insmod test.ko
If kernel is compiled with CONFIG_LOCKDEP, then, without patch, lockdep
crashes on the second module insertion.
>
> Confused,
> Rusty.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@ispras.ru>
>> ---
>> kernel/module.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
>> index 3965511..2b44de4 100644
>> --- a/kernel/module.c
>> +++ b/kernel/module.c
>> @@ -3311,6 +3311,9 @@ static int load_module(struct load_info *info, const char __user *uargs,
>> module_bug_cleanup(mod);
>> mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
>>
>> + /* Free lock-classes: */
>> + lockdep_free_key_range(mod->module_core, mod->core_size);
>> +
>> /* we can't deallocate the module until we clear memory protection */
>> unset_module_init_ro_nx(mod);
>> unset_module_core_ro_nx(mod);
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
--
Best regards,
Andrey Tsyvarev
Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
web:http://linuxtesting.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-20 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 6:25 [PATCH] kernel/module.c: Free lock-classes if parse_args failed Andrey Tsyvarev
2015-01-20 6:37 ` Rusty Russell
2015-01-20 7:47 ` Andrey Tsyvarev [this message]
2015-01-21 1:40 ` Rusty Russell
2015-01-21 10:49 ` Andrey Tsyvarev
2015-01-22 0:40 ` Rusty Russell
2015-01-22 9:27 ` Andrey Tsyvarev
2015-01-20 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-19 0:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-19 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-19 12:24 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54BE082A.20207@ispras.ru \
--to=tsyvarev@ispras.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox