From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753453AbbAVS1a (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:27:30 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:28299 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752707AbbAVS12 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:27:28 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,450,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="666019626" Message-ID: <54C1403D.1010608@intel.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:23:57 -0800 From: Tadeusz Struk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephan Mueller CC: Herbert Xu , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "'LKML'" Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: aesni: add setkey for driver-gcm-aes-aesni References: <2587101.YvN0IxRmOH@tachyon.chronox.de> <20150120031704.GB10475@gondor.apana.org.au> <40625395.stBBYbAQtz@tachyon.chronox.de> In-Reply-To: <40625395.stBBYbAQtz@tachyon.chronox.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/20/2015 05:25 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote: >> Rather than adding a bogus setkey function, please fix this mess >> properly by moving the top-level setkey function into the __driver >> one where it should be. Compare with how we handle it in the >> ablk_helper which is pretty much the same thing. > > Tadeusz, are you working on that update or shall I have a look? > Hi, No, I thought that the agreement was that we don't want to allow user space to use these helpers directly, right? Am I missing something?