linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: question about save_xstate_sig() - WHY DOES THIS WORK?
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 08:39:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C3A08D.3070301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54C2B80B.8050501@zytor.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/23/2015 04:07 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/23/2015 11:34 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> While working on a patch series to defer FPU state loading until 
>> kernel -> user space transition, and be more lazy with FPU state 
>> while in the kernel, I came across this code in
>> save_xstate_sig().
>> 
>> Not only is this broken with my new code, but it looks like it
>> may be broken with the current code, too...
>> 
>> Specifically, save_user_xstate() may page fault and sleep. After 
>> returning from the page fault, there is no guarantee that the FPU
>> state will be restored into the CPU, when the system is not 
>> running with eager fpu mode.
>> 
>> In that case, what prevents us from saving random FPU register
>> state to the user's stack frame?  Potentially state containing
>> data from other programs...
>> 
> 
> If the FPU state is not current, we'll have CR0.TS = 1 and the
> XSAVE will cause an #NM exception, which will cause the FPU state
> to be swapped in.

OK, so the code works as it is right now, but I still need
to have the patch in my "defer FPU state loading and CR0.TS
switching to kernel -> user space transition" patch series.

Thanks for explaining why the current code is safe, Peter.

- -- 
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUw6CNAAoJEM553pKExN6DIkIH/jYpLRfVSbx+JBuFtOibA6jk
wwWnwNdPRUiWf0v0lSNX4phk9f7VCy8WKbrFtC0IYdGLL0zCY94dN7us4hNYo9fE
btdb/qsvqq8w2esPuUczAgaxwipYVliDUDOHSXTRbPS2upBuLHl/CVIVb1A+HVC7
gB6GF4ZLa2P1ygcjuWDNDNtx04QWTi7K80eWtWAQ7U4OK9Y4fSgR3hOIJS79M/aJ
P9YGaTyo0zDQcKx1rFXTjl9A0slCFZ+QkAeCwLZRkXc1K9n50GANuYeg53/ATYey
7x0FjZEBD2ipX60FqZ+mYAiA7rqw4RYKgAttszy9b9bgKY/fzHy87z2YS8Umplg=
=55wt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-24 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-23 19:34 question about save_xstate_sig() - WHY DOES THIS WORK? Rik van Riel
2015-01-23 20:51 ` [PATCH, RFC] x86,fpu: make signal handling xstate save & restore preemption safe Rik van Riel
2015-01-23 21:07 ` question about save_xstate_sig() - WHY DOES THIS WORK? H. Peter Anvin
2015-01-24 13:39   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2015-01-24 20:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-26 23:27   ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-27 19:40     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-27 20:27       ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-27 20:50         ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:01           ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 20:45         ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 20:52           ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:00           ` [PATCH RFC] x86,fpu: merge save_init_fpu & unlazy_fpu Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:21             ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:07 ` [PATCH 0/3]: x86, fpu: unlazy_fpu fixes/cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:07   ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, fpu: unlazy_fpu: don't reset thread.fpu_counter Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:26     ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:08   ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, fpu: unlazy_fpu: don't do __thread_fpu_end() if use_eager_fpu() Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:36     ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:49       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:53         ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:54     ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:08   ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, fpu: kill save_init_fpu(), change math_error() to use unlazy_fpu() Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:54     ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:17   ` [PATCH 0/3]: x86, fpu: unlazy_fpu fixes/cleanups Dave Hansen
2015-01-29 21:33     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:43       ` Dave Hansen
2015-01-29 21:56         ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:58           ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 23:26           ` Dave Hansen
2015-01-30  1:33             ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-02 18:11               ` Dave Hansen
2015-01-30 12:45             ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-30 13:30               ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-30 13:43                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-30 17:49   ` [PATCH 0/3] cleanups to the disable lazy fpu restore code riel
2015-01-30 17:49     ` [PATCH 1/3] x86,fpu: move lazy restore functions up a few lines riel
2015-01-30 17:49     ` [PATCH 2/3] x86,fpu: introduce task_disable_lazy_fpu_restore helper riel
2015-01-30 17:49     ` [PATCH 3/3] x86,fpu: use disable_task_lazy_fpu_restore helper riel
2015-01-30 21:46       ` Dave Hansen
2015-01-30 21:48         ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-02 17:56         ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-02 18:00   ` [PATCH 0/6] cleanups to lazy FPU restore code riel
2015-02-02 18:00     ` [PATCH 1/6] x86,fpu: move lazy restore functions up a few lines riel
2015-02-02 18:00     ` [PATCH 2/6] x86,fpu: introduce task_disable_lazy_fpu_restore helper riel
2015-02-02 18:00     ` [PATCH 3/6] x86,fpu: use an explicit if/else in switch_fpu_prepare riel
2015-02-02 18:00     ` [PATCH 4/6] x86,fpu: use disable_task_lazy_fpu_restore helper riel
2015-02-02 19:21       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-02 19:43         ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-03 19:08           ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-03 22:01             ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-06 16:42         ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-02 18:00     ` [PATCH 5/6] x86,fpu: also check fpu_lazy_restore when use_eager_fpu riel
2015-02-02 18:55       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-02 19:19         ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-02 18:00     ` [PATCH 6/6] x86,fpu: remove redundant increments of fpu_counter riel
2015-02-02 18:34       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-02 18:40         ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-18 23:40           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-18 23:54             ` Borislav Petkov
2015-02-19 20:09             ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54C3A08D.3070301@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).