From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
ARM Maintainers <arm@kernel.org>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
"Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: re-fromat AT91 part to match other entries
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:45:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C660FE.3000401@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2263559.r5MiMeqJt6@wuerfel>
Le 14/01/2015 10:05, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> On Wednesday 14 January 2015 00:47:59 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>
>> On 13/01/2015 at 15:09:56 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote :
>>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>>> The entries are separated as ARM V4/V5 and ARM V7 as some other per-SoC config
>>>> options may be removed in the near future.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Hi Olof,
>>>>
>>>> This is an attempt to match other ARM SoC families format.
>>>> If you feel that the patch can be good, do not hesitate to take it yourself. I
>>>> don't plan to integrate it in any of my pull-request so it can appear quickly in
>>>> arm-soc and can be used by everyone.
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> If you see what Peter did, he split up the rules per-SoC based on how
>>> things were selectable in Kconfig. Since you seem to have the Kconfig
>>> entries already, how about doing the same? That way the same information
>>> w.r.t. SoC family that you have as comments isn't lost either.
>>>
>>
>> You didn't see the patch set yet because it depends on a lot of other
>> series still being discussed but after the switch to multiplatform, the
>> only config option left will be SOC_AT91RM9200, SOC_AT91SAM9 (both
>> under SOC_SAM_V4_V5) and SOC_SAMA5, under SOC_SAM_V7.
>>
>> That's our plan, unless you feel that we should keep one config option
>> per SoC.
>
> With the patches that I prepared last year, all of AT91SAM9 becomes
> one small file, so there really isn't any need to have separate Kconfig
> options.
Hi Olof,
After what noted Alexandre and Arnd, don't you think my initial attempt
was okay? Aka: ping ;-)
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-26 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20150112224203.GL22090@quad.lixom.net>
2015-01-13 14:43 ` [PATCH] ARM: dts: re-fromat AT91 part to match other entries Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-13 23:09 ` Olof Johansson
2015-01-13 23:47 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-14 9:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-26 15:45 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-01-27 2:13 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C660FE.3000401@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox