From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754743AbbAZPpM (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:45:12 -0500 Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.243]:11534 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753127AbbAZPpI (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:45:08 -0500 Message-ID: <54C660FE.3000401@atmel.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:45:02 +0100 From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: atmel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olof Johansson CC: Arnd Bergmann , Alexandre Belloni , ARM Maintainers , Boris BREZILLON , "Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: re-fromat AT91 part to match other entries References: <20150112224203.GL22090@quad.lixom.net> <20150113230956.GA15087@quad.lixom.net> <20150113234759.GH3843@piout.net> <2263559.r5MiMeqJt6@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: <2263559.r5MiMeqJt6@wuerfel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.161.30.18] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 14/01/2015 10:05, Arnd Bergmann a écrit : > On Wednesday 14 January 2015 00:47:59 Alexandre Belloni wrote: >> >> On 13/01/2015 at 15:09:56 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote : >>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>>> The entries are separated as ARM V4/V5 and ARM V7 as some other per-SoC config >>>> options may be removed in the near future. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre >>>> --- >>>> Hi Olof, >>>> >>>> This is an attempt to match other ARM SoC families format. >>>> If you feel that the patch can be good, do not hesitate to take it yourself. I >>>> don't plan to integrate it in any of my pull-request so it can appear quickly in >>>> arm-soc and can be used by everyone. >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> If you see what Peter did, he split up the rules per-SoC based on how >>> things were selectable in Kconfig. Since you seem to have the Kconfig >>> entries already, how about doing the same? That way the same information >>> w.r.t. SoC family that you have as comments isn't lost either. >>> >> >> You didn't see the patch set yet because it depends on a lot of other >> series still being discussed but after the switch to multiplatform, the >> only config option left will be SOC_AT91RM9200, SOC_AT91SAM9 (both >> under SOC_SAM_V4_V5) and SOC_SAMA5, under SOC_SAM_V7. >> >> That's our plan, unless you feel that we should keep one config option >> per SoC. > > With the patches that I prepared last year, all of AT91SAM9 becomes > one small file, so there really isn't any need to have separate Kconfig > options. Hi Olof, After what noted Alexandre and Arnd, don't you think my initial attempt was okay? Aka: ping ;-) Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre