From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932484AbbA2XSA (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:18:00 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55742 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932434AbbA2XR5 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:17:57 -0500
Message-ID: <54CABF46.3050701@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:16:22 -0500
From: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
CC: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        "phoenix.liyi@huawei.com" <phoenix.liyi@huawei.com>,
        Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
        "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>, Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
        "wangyijing@huawei.com" <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        "hanjun.guo@linaro.org" <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 04/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param
 for "acpi" and pass acpi=force to enable ACPI
References: <CAOZdJXU2bFR1T4ZnGavvnrUXAp5e=vNt9g6WKX46H8qs1wz-TQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZdJXXe+29rux1L3QYBX0yHLy3kdi+ZJrXVd=XfgYN=R6DtKA@mail.gmail.com> <20150128181453.GG31752@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <54C92804.5090806@codeaurora.org> <20150129151956.GF8951@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <CAKv+Gu_=si=L5+vvg+8hRgwmTahqdePw5bZxUMFSZ8obk-VXFQ@mail.gmail.com> <54CA7A42.5080800@codeaurora.org> <CAKv+Gu_a6_zjt=MsRuQH2rr05XxDayy0gACtbPXZaDAyhWrigg@mail.gmail.com> <54CA7D4A.5090709@codeaurora.org> <54CA7F94.6000305@redhat.com> <20150129231120.GA23786@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150129231120.GA23786@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 01/29/2015 06:11 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> Sorry Jon but statements like this make me wonder whether we should
> simply let the whole ARM ACPI be an out of tree distro business. We
> spend a long time discussing OS-agnostic firmware implementation,
> planning mini-summits, just to get certain Linux distro representative
> stating that the kernel-firmware interface we discuss here only matters
> for those planning to follow upstream. Certain Linux distros will play
> by other rules.

Oh, don't take it that way - I just mean that if someone needs a
different ACPI always on, they can do that separately. I support your
position on upstream at this time! :)

Jon.