From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Robert Rosengren <robert.rosengren@axis.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: Fix i2c word access when using SMBus access functions
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 06:21:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D0D979.30307@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150203114210.GG21293@sirena.org.uk>
On 02/03/2015 03:42 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 06:30:02AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 02/02/2015 03:56 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> Yes, we really ought to handle _NATIVE too (though the chances of it
>>> being used with I2C are minimal, it's mostly for MMIO). This also feels
>
>> Well, we do; it is handled similar to the big endian case with the current
>> code. Do you think it should be handled differently ? If yes, how ?
>
> Perhaps it just needs to be more explicit about how it's handling native
> endian? I didn't spot it.
>
Thinking about it, we should actually reject requests for _NATIVE. SMBus
16 bit accesses are either little endian or big endian.
>>> like it's something that should be being handled further up the stack in
>>> the serialization code but given that there's direct functions for this
>>> in the smbus code perhaps it's better here. Or perhaps the smbus
>>> support ought to be transitioned to use the bus interface and set
>>> reg_write() and reg_read() operations now that we can do that, it seems
>>> like a better fit though it might break compatibility with wierd devices.
>
>> I thought about that, but since the smbus functions perform endianness
>> conversion it would mean that I would have to undo that conversion just
>> to have it done again.
>
> No, the whole point is that by doing this you avoid any endianness
> conversions or formatting in the framework at all so you can just use
> the smbus functions to handle the formatting.
>
Ah, guess I got confused. The SMBus accesses are already using reg_read
and reg_write.
Thanks,
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-03 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-01 23:48 [PATCH] regmap: Fix i2c word access when using SMBus access functions Guenter Roeck
2015-02-02 10:09 ` Jean Delvare
2015-02-02 10:26 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-02-02 11:56 ` Mark Brown
2015-02-02 14:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-02-03 11:42 ` Mark Brown
2015-02-03 14:21 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2015-02-03 16:09 ` Mark Brown
2015-02-03 16:58 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54D0D979.30307@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.rosengren@axis.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox