From: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>
To: Gilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org>
Cc: sdharia@codeaurora.org, mlocke@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iivanov@mm-sol.com,
galak@codeaurora.org, agross@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] spmi: pmic_arb: add support for hw version 2
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:14:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D10210.5030106@mm-sol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D0FE6F.4090709@codeaurora.org>
On 02/03/2015 06:59 PM, Gilad Avidov wrote:
> Hi Stan,
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
> On 2/3/2015 2:59 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> Hi Gilad,
>>
>> Thanks for the patch.
>>
>> On 01/31/2015 02:46 AM, Gilad Avidov wrote:
>>> Qualcomm PMIC Arbiter version-2 changes from version-1 are:
>>>
>>> - Some different register offsets.
>>> - New channel register space, one per PMIC peripheral (ppid).
>>> All tx traffic uses these channels.
>>> - New observer register space. All rx trafic uses this space.
>>> - Different command format for spmi command registers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org>
>>> Acked-by: Sagar Dharia <sdharia@codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb.txt | 6 +-
>>> drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 310
>>> +++++++++++++++++----
>>> 2 files changed, 260 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>>>
<snip>
>>> +/* v1 offset per ee */
>>> +static u32 pmic_arb_offset_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev *pa, u8 sid,
>>> u16 addr)
>>> +{
>>> + return 0x800 + 0x80 * (pa->channel);
>> no braces here and in below ops
>
> will remove braces above.
>
> About below:
> Did you mean to remove braces from ops such as:
>
> (sid << 8) | (addr >> 8)
> and
> (opc << 27) | ((sid & 0xf) << 20) | (addr << 4) | (bc & 0x7)
>
> ?
no, that's fine.
>
> In the latter case I think the braces improve readability.
I think so, too.
--
regards,
Stan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-03 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-31 0:46 [PATCH V2 0/2] add support for pmic_arb v2 and correct framework Gilad Avidov
2015-01-31 0:46 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] spmi: remove wakeup command before slave probe Gilad Avidov
2015-02-03 9:36 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-02-04 1:17 ` Gilad Avidov
2015-01-31 0:46 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] spmi: pmic_arb: add support for hw version 2 Gilad Avidov
2015-02-03 9:59 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-02-03 16:59 ` Gilad Avidov
2015-02-03 17:14 ` Stanimir Varbanov [this message]
2015-02-03 21:21 ` Lina Iyer
2015-02-04 14:36 ` Stanimir Varbanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54D10210.5030106@mm-sol.com \
--to=svarbanov@mm-sol.com \
--cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gavidov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iivanov@mm-sol.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlocke@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sdharia@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox