From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753153AbbBESfl (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:35:41 -0500 Received: from www.sr71.net ([198.145.64.142]:36290 "EHLO blackbird.sr71.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751994AbbBESfk (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:35:40 -0500 Message-ID: <54D3B7F5.9070209@sr71.net> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 10:35:33 -0800 From: Dave Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com CC: Steven Rostedt , sedat.dilek@gmail.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-next , LKML , Stephen Rothwell , Kristen Carlson Accardi , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4 References: <20150205001019.GA12362@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150205005716.GS5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150205015144.GT5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <54D3186F.7030500@sr71.net> <20150205130343.6ac0eda9@gandalf.local.home> <20150205130802.289a8be0@gandalf.local.home> <54D3B253.3050000@sr71.net> <20150205183412.GI5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20150205183412.GI5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/05/2015 10:34 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> > Did I actually need to be >> > onlining/offlining CPUs to hit the splat that Sedat was reporting? > Yep, you do need to offline at least one CPU to hit that splat. Heh, do we need a debugging mode that will randomly offline/online CPUs? :)