From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752186AbbBFTJm (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:09:42 -0500 Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:42149 "EHLO mail-la0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751083AbbBFTJk (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:09:40 -0500 Message-ID: <54D51170.10903@cogentembedded.com> Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 22:09:36 +0300 From: Sergei Shtylyov Organization: Cogent Embedded User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Javier Martinez Canillas , Kukjin Kim CC: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrzej Hajda , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marek Szyprowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: Use more descriptive names for Exynos5420 PDs References: <1423244258-24314-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1423244258-24314-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. On 02/06/2015 08:37 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > All the device nodes for the Exynos5420 power-domains have a quite > generic "power-domain" name. And this is in conformance to the ePAPR standard. > So in case of an error, the Exynos PD > driver shows the following (not very useful) message: > "Power domain power-domain disable failed" Why not fix the message instead to use the full device name? > Use descriptive names to know on which PD enable or disable failed. > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas WBR, Sergei