Re: [RFC PATCH] x86, fpu: Use eagerfpu by default on all CPUs

[Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/23/2015 12:22 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> wrote:

>> One implication of this is that in kernel mode, we can no longer
>> just assume that the user space FPU state is always loaded, and
>> we need to check for that (like the lazy FPU code does today).  I
>> would really like to keep that code around, for obvious reasons
>> :)
> 
> I like that stuff, except for the fact that it still has code that 
> depends on whether we're in eager or lazy mode, even though eager
> is a little less eager with your patches.  Ideally I'd like to see
> your patches applied *and* lazy mode removed.

The latest version of my code (which I should forward-port
again to the latest tip bits) simplifies things a lot.

It moves all new task handling to switch_fpu_finished(),
which is called from do_notify_resume().

At that point we either load the FPU context, or we
set CR0.TS.

- -- 
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU6yI3AAoJEM553pKExN6DyQEH/13E0T6wsII5L+0W1D0WU4v5
F2SmU74zvCv+RhRl/0npvKRQC3IkZ/peM9h/1PU/r61Y39VhexUxiUZ86afzz4KJ
ogPNEs6HZ8UYSji6RPlVsuJJ4vCsZ9GA+27JwKGzLUG1NfniL0qlc93rl+f3ZfFm
5H4bjtcO361Am15yKkFPRl/0PKqRhMDa4tzJGkvvCaJ+k195Ik0a7WXjOlGdIeJA
5Q1D0qaAccXtwfNjqhxIfTBi1LV2a1/jCKF8ktxGJ2+Ywvau9blJnPfD8vUf9JL2
9/le1kyNU3h8B2lU0jIi4a2Y/CcU47heEUy5htmoo6wChQWAy/pR8JaE6++qWqI=
=ee/J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----