From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752093AbbCAJwo (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Mar 2015 04:52:44 -0500 Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:43020 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750794AbbCAJwm (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Mar 2015 04:52:42 -0500 Message-ID: <54F2E162.9050604@iogearbox.net> Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 10:52:34 +0100 From: Daniel Borkmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Deacon CC: "davem@davemloft.net" , "ast@plumgrid.com" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Laura Abbott , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/10] arm64: unexport set_memory_ro and set_memory_rw References: <20150227195443.GD24818@arm.com> <54F0CDF7.7060900@iogearbox.net> In-Reply-To: <54F0CDF7.7060900@iogearbox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Will, On 02/27/2015 09:05 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 02/27/2015 08:54 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > ... >> Looks good to me. Can this be applied independently, or does it need to >> remain part of your series? > > Ideally, it should be seen as part of this series, but I have no problem > if this one goes via arm64 tree, instead. What Dave and you prefer. ;) I'll resend you this one directly as a stand-alone patch to arm64, with Acked-by's preserved. Thanks, Daniel