From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755498AbbCBQ5J (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2015 11:57:09 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52772 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751526AbbCBQ5G (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2015 11:57:06 -0500 Message-ID: <54F4965D.7000701@suse.de> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 17:57:01 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= Organization: SUSE Linux GmbH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Mueller CC: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Peter Crosthwaite , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov , Alexander Graf , Eduardo Habkost , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger , "Jason J. Herne" , Cornelia Huck , Paolo Bonzini , Alistair Francis , Richard Henderson Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/16] Introduce probe mode for machine type none References: <1425300248-40277-1-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1425300248-40277-2-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <54F46C41.3000201@suse.de> <20150302174352.3715f1e4@bee> In-Reply-To: <20150302174352.3715f1e4@bee> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 02.03.2015 um 17:43 schrieb Michael Mueller: > On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:57:21 +0100 > Andreas Färber wrote: > >>> int configure_accelerator(MachineState *ms) >>> { >>> - const char *p; >>> + const char *p, *name; >>> char buf[10]; >>> int ret; >>> bool accel_initialised = false; >>> bool init_failed = false; >>> AccelClass *acc = NULL; >>> + ObjectClass *oc; >>> + bool probe_mode = false; >>> >>> p = qemu_opt_get(qemu_get_machine_opts(), "accel"); >>> if (p == NULL) { >>> - /* Use the default "accelerator", tcg */ >>> - p = "tcg"; >>> + oc = (ObjectClass *) MACHINE_GET_CLASS(current_machine); >>> + name = object_class_get_name(oc); >>> + probe_mode = !strcmp(name, "none" TYPE_MACHINE_SUFFIX); >>> + if (probe_mode) { >>> + /* Use these accelerators in probe mode, tcg should be last */ >>> + p = probe_mode_accels; >>> + } else { >>> + /* Use the default "accelerator", tcg */ >>> + p = "tcg"; >>> + } >>> } >> >> Can't we instead use an explicit ,accel=probe or ,accel=auto? >> That would then obsolete the next patch. > > How would you express the following with the accel= approach? > > -probe -machine s390-ccw,accel=kvm > > Using machine "none" as default with tcg as last accelerator initialized should not break > anything. > > -M none Let me ask differently: What does -machine none or -M none have to do with probing? It reads as if you are introducing two probe modes. Why do you need both? If we have -probe, isn't that independent of which machine we specify? Who is going to call either, with which respective goal? I think that changing the semantics of an absent ,accel=foo parameter to mean something else than its longtime default of tcg is a bad idea. Have you testing qtest with it? Doesn't -qtest imply accel=qtest or is that always passed explicitly? Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)