From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] sched/deadline: fix pull if dl task who's prio changed is not on queue
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:32:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F57FAD.4020306@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424918285-94574-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
[+Kirill]
On 26/02/2015 02:38, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Dl task who is not on queue and it is also the curr task simultaneously
> can not happen. In addition, pull since the priority of a not on queue
> dl task doesn't make any sense.
>
> This patch fix it by don't pull if dl task who's prio changed is not on
> queue.
>
So, this is something that was already raised by Kirill, but I always
forgot to fix :/. Thanks for reminding me!
I have this fix:
>From 8fcb04eee2d76042970e9561d253d1bc1fe4cc2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 07:51:56 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] sched/deadline: cleanup prio_changed_dl()
rq->curr task can't be in "dequeued" state in prio_changed_dl()
(The only place we can have that is __schedule()), but it can
be throttled, in which case we shouldn't do balancing.
Also modify the "else" branch, which is dead code (switched_to_dl()
is not interested in dequeued tasks and we are not interested
in balancing in this case), to take into account updates to not
running tasks.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Suggested-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index cfa45c1..9d83748 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1759,7 +1759,10 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
int oldprio)
{
- if (task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->curr == p) {
+ if (!on_dl_rq(&p->dl))
+ return;
+
+ if (rq->curr == p) {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* This might be too much, but unfortunately
@@ -1786,8 +1789,15 @@ static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
*/
resched_curr(rq);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
- } else
- switched_to_dl(rq, p);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * This task is not running, so if its deadline is
+ * now more imminent than that of the current running
+ * task then reschedule.
+ */
+ if (dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline, rq->curr->dl.deadline))
+ resched_curr(rq);
+ }
}
const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = {
--
2.3.0
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 49f92c8..ca391c0 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1728,7 +1728,10 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> int oldprio)
> {
> - if (task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->curr == p) {
> + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
> + return;
> +
> + if (rq->curr == p) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /*
> * This might be too much, but unfortunately
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-03 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-26 2:38 [PATCH RESEND] sched/deadline: fix pull if dl task who's prio changed is not on queue Wanpeng Li
2015-03-03 9:32 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2015-03-05 1:27 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-03-05 1:28 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F57FAD.4020306@arm.com \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox