From: Kapileshwar Singh <kapileshwar.singh@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Javi Merino <Javi.Merino@arm.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Punit Agrawal <Punit.Agrawal@arm.com>,
Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] thermal: cpu_cooling: update the cpu device when cpufreq updates the policy cpu
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 15:34:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F5D49F.2060408@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpokrxi2p0Ad3SZDjX90gk7HSgwHwNs5DTiYPZYUZMOTJSA@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/03/15 15:29, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 3 March 2015 at 20:39, Kapileshwar Singh <kapileshwar.singh@arm.com> wrote:
>
>> I did test this but we were working with the assumption that OPPs should be populated for all the CPUs and also that OPPs are lost for a hotplugged CPU which I see is not the case.
>
> Then what did you test? My point here is, even with the latest patches
> that you have
> sent, you wouldn't be able to get the OPPs once policy->cpu goes down. So, how
> did this worked for you ?
We were basing our fix on possibility of having OPPs for all the CPUs and we incorrectly attributed the erroneous OPP we got from dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact to the missing OPPs in the other CPUs.
>
>> We have looked at this more closely and found that problem lies in:
>>
>> freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpumask_any(&cpufreq_device->allowed_cpus));
>>
>> which returns a NULL frequency as we are not checking for online CPUs here. We shall come up with a fix for this. Many thanks for helping us with the investigation.
>
> Right.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-03 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-02 17:17 [PATCH v3 0/5] Subject: The power allocator thermal governor Javi Merino
2015-03-02 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] thermal: introduce the Power Allocator governor Javi Merino
2015-03-02 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] thermal: add trace events to the power allocator governor Javi Merino
2017-03-15 4:26 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-02 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] thermal: export thermal_zone_parameters to sysfs Javi Merino
2015-03-02 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] Revert "cpufreq: remove CPUFREQ_UPDATE_POLICY_CPU notifications" Javi Merino
2015-03-02 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] thermal: cpu_cooling: update the cpu device when cpufreq updates the policy cpu Javi Merino
2015-03-03 4:03 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-03 10:59 ` Kapileshwar Singh
2015-03-03 11:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-03 11:41 ` Kapileshwar Singh
2015-03-03 13:07 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-03 15:09 ` Kapileshwar Singh
2015-03-03 15:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-03 15:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-03 15:33 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-03 15:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-03 15:34 ` Kapileshwar Singh [this message]
2015-03-02 17:28 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Subject: The power allocator thermal governor Eduardo Valentin
2015-03-02 17:40 ` Javi Merino
2015-03-02 18:47 ` Eduardo Valentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F5D49F.2060408@arm.com \
--to=kapileshwar.singh@arm.com \
--cc=Javi.Merino@arm.com \
--cc=Punit.Agrawal@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tixy@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox