From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932316AbbCCRto (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 12:49:44 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:51699 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757639AbbCCRtm (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 12:49:42 -0500 Message-ID: <54F5F414.2070608@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:49:08 -0700 From: David Ahern User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jiri Olsa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Corey Ashford , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Paul Mackerras , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] tools build: Allow to override feature checks setup References: <1425392797-22572-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> <1425392797-22572-13-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1425392797-22572-13-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/3/15 7:26 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > Allowing to override configuration variables for feature > checks. Also adding automated test and documentation. Rather than an 'override' why not require users to specify feature checks of interest? ie., the previous patch moved all of perf's feature checks to a common Makefile. Why not have perf specify features of interest to it instead? David