From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754407AbbCEHMY (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 02:12:24 -0500 Received: from mail-bn1on0113.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.110.113]:52147 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753924AbbCEHMW (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 02:12:22 -0500 Message-ID: <54F801CD.7040706@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:12:13 +0200 From: Cristian Stoica User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kim Phillips CC: , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: caam: fix some compile warnings References: <1425365453-19358-1-git-send-email-yanjiang.jin@windriver.com> <1425365453-19358-2-git-send-email-yanjiang.jin@windriver.com> <20150303125953.8585904680288a9734566b42@freescale.com> <54F66EA3.7080506@windriver.com> <54F6909D.8040002@windriver.com> <54F6CA60.5030905@freescale.com> <20150304123419.7baecac7320d5b3483449dab@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <20150304123419.7baecac7320d5b3483449dab@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 Authentication-Results: spf=fail (sender IP is 192.88.158.2) smtp.mailfrom=cristian.stoica@freescale.com; freescale.mail.onmicrosoft.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:192.88.158.2;CTRY:US;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;BMV:1;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(339900001)(164054003)(479174004)(24454002)(189002)(377454003)(199003)(76176999)(65816999)(105606002)(54356999)(59896002)(85426001)(47776003)(558084003)(80316001)(87936001)(110136001)(450100001)(50986999)(87266999)(83506001)(106466001)(65956001)(6806004)(46102003)(2950100001)(33656002)(92566002)(104016003)(65806001)(62966003)(23746002)(50466002)(77156002)(77096005)(36756003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:BL2PR03MB385;H:az84smr01.freescale.net;FPR:;SPF:Fail;MLV:sfv;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BL2PR03MB385; X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(5002007)(5005006);SRVR:BL2PR03MB385;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BL2PR03MB385; X-Forefront-PRVS: 05066DEDBB X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2015 07:12:17.5212 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 710a03f5-10f6-4d38-9ff4-a80b81da590d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=710a03f5-10f6-4d38-9ff4-a80b81da590d;Ip=[192.88.158.2] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL2PR03MB385 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/04/2015 08:34 PM, Kim Phillips wrote: > I don't see how, e.g., for one, dma_map_sg is I/O TLB > implementation-dependent. I'll need some remedial classes on this topic, but for the moment I don't see how this matters for mapping sg chains. Can you share some pointers? Thanks, Cristian S.