Re: [PATCH] net: can: Enable xilinx driver for all ARCHs

Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-03-09T09:56:38Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2628 bytes --]

On 03/09/2015 10:52 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 03/09/2015 10:13 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 03/09/2015 09:58 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> On 03/09/2015 09:50 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>>> On 03/09/2015 09:48 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>>> Remove Kconfig dependency and enable driver for
>>>>> all ARCHs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Test for all archs done by Kbuild test robot without any problem.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/net/can/Kconfig | 1 -
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
>>>>> index 98d73aab52fe..f690c3fb3088 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
>>>>> @@ -131,7 +131,6 @@ config CAN_RCAR
>>>>>
>>>>> config CAN_XILINXCAN
>>>>> tristate "Xilinx CAN"
>>>>> - depends on ARCH_ZYNQ || MICROBLAZE || COMPILE_TEST
>>>>
>>>> I think that's what COMPILE_TEST ist for?
>>>
>>> For compilation yes but not for enabling. Currently this driver
>>> can be also used on ARM64 that's why people suggesting directly
>>> to remove dependency on arch and then COMPILE_TEST can be removed
>>> too.
>>
>> In the past (May 2014) I had people complaining that certain ARM SoC
>> specific drivers are enabled on ARM in general, not just on that SoC. As
>> I'm not following arm64 in detail, has the notion of using depends on
>> ARCH changes since then?
>>
>>> Or do you want me to change description to mention that this is for
>>> ARM64 enabling?
>>
>> Given this is consensus, a remark to ARM64 would be appreciated. :)
>
> David has applied this patch which is in general just the same as this one.
>
> (linux-next) Remove architecture dependency
> 28811a8c00fe0d899b8a544421f3b4947425d5e8
>
> Mark Brown has suggested to do so for spi and don't check architecture at
> all.
> I have also sent similar patch for watchdog driver too.
>
> I think it is up to you if you want to add ARM64 to Kconfig or just remove
> that arch dependencies.
> To be honest my goal is to enable this driver for ARM64.
> Please tell me what way you prefer.

I like the idea of removing the depends on ARCH completely. Jean, what
do you think?

regards,
Marc

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]