linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>
To: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@mm-sol.com>, Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spmi: pmic_arb: enable build on arm64 platforms
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 18:53:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FDD00D.6000808@mm-sol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424696228.2340.7.camel@mm-sol.com>

On 02/23/2015 02:57 PM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 19:46 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:27 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>>> On 02/04/2015 05:14 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:05 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>>>>> On 02/03/2015 10:42 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 15:50 +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
>>>>>>> index bf1295e..115348c 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
>>>>>>> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ if SPMI
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  config SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB
>>>>>>>         tristate "Qualcomm MSM SPMI Controller (PMIC Arbiter)"
>>>>>>> -       depends on ARM
>>>>>>> +       depends on ARM || ARM64
>>>>>>>         depends on IRQ_DOMAIN
>>>>>>>         depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
>>>>>>>         default ARCH_QCOM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But only if COMPILE_TEST is set too, isn't it? Is that intended?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, the driver will be used on arm64 qcom platforms, also.
>>>>
>>>> But ARCH_QCOM currently is (32 bit) arch/arm only, isn't it?
>>>
>>> Currently yes, but we want to be prepared to support PMIC's which will
>>> be used on arm64 platforms, although they are not upstream yet.
>>
>> Please make the commit summary reflect that, as in:
>>     "spmi: pmic_arb: enable test build on arm64"
>>
>> Commit explanation likewise.
> 
> What if we just drop ARM dependency? 

I'm fine with this, Paul?

-- 
regards,
Stan

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-09 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-03 13:50 [PATCH] spmi: pmic_arb: enable build on arm64 platforms Stanimir Varbanov
2015-02-03 20:42 ` Paul Bolle
2015-02-04 15:05   ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-02-04 15:14     ` Paul Bolle
2015-02-04 15:27       ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-02-04 18:46         ` Paul Bolle
2015-02-23 12:57           ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-03-09 16:53             ` Stanimir Varbanov [this message]
2015-03-09 18:57               ` Paul Bolle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54FDD00D.6000808@mm-sol.com \
    --to=svarbanov@mm-sol.com \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iivanov@mm-sol.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).