public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	<linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio / ACPI: Avoid unnecessary checks in __gpiod_get_index()
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:36:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FF9C0F.3060107@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1829371.gDPkhnsp25@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 2015/3/11 6:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> If dev is NULL in __gpiod_get_index() and both ACPI and OF are
> enabled, it will be checked twice before the code decides to give
> up with DT/ACPI lookup, so avoid that.
>
> Also use the observation that ACPI_COMPANION() is much more efficient
> than ACPI_HANDLE(), because the latter uses the former and carries out
> a check and a pointer dereference on top of it, so replace the
> ACPI_HANDLE() check with an ACPI_COMPANION() one which does not
> require the additional IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) check too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Quite straight forward to me, for both two patches,

Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>

Thanks
Hanjun

> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c |   16 +++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -1865,13 +1865,15 @@ struct gpio_desc *__must_check __gpiod_g
>  
>  	dev_dbg(dev, "GPIO lookup for consumer %s\n", con_id);
>  
> -	/* Using device tree? */
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev && dev->of_node) {
> -		dev_dbg(dev, "using device tree for GPIO lookup\n");
> -		desc = of_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
> -	} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) && dev && ACPI_HANDLE(dev)) {
> -		dev_dbg(dev, "using ACPI for GPIO lookup\n");
> -		desc = acpi_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
> +	if (dev) {
> +		/* Using device tree? */
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) {
> +			dev_dbg(dev, "using device tree for GPIO lookup\n");
> +			desc = of_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
> +		} else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) {
> +			dev_dbg(dev, "using ACPI for GPIO lookup\n");
> +			desc = acpi_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>



  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-11  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-10 22:07 [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE() Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-10 22:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio / ACPI: Avoid unnecessary checks in __gpiod_get_index() Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-11  1:36   ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2015-03-11  8:43   ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-18  1:33   ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-10 22:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio / ACPI: Use local variable instead of ACPI_HANDLE() Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-11  8:43   ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-18  1:35   ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-18  1:37 ` [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE() Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-18  1:47   ` Alexandre Courbot
2015-03-18 14:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54FF9C0F.3060107@huawei.com \
    --to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox