From: "Jon Rosen (jrosen)" <jrosen@cisco.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
David Windsor <dwindsor@gmail.com>,
"Rosen, Rami" <rami.rosen@intel.com>,
"Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
"Mike Maloney" <maloney@google.com>,
Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] packet: mark ring entry as in-use inside spin_lock to prevent RX ring overrun
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 14:34:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54c7cbde468c45609e36738baa5ea084@XCH-RTP-016.cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180403161630.24f8339c@xeon-e3>
> > diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> > index e0f3f4a..264d7b2 100644
> > --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> > +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> > @@ -2287,6 +2287,15 @@ static int tpacket_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> > if (po->stats.stats1.tp_drops)
> > status |= TP_STATUS_LOSING;
> > }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Mark this entry as TP_STATUS_IN_PROGRESS to prevent other
> > + * kernel threads from re-using this same entry.
> > + */
> > +#define TP_STATUS_IN_PROGRESS TP_STATUS_LOSING
> > + if (po->tp_version <= TPACKET_V2)
> > + __packet_set_status(po, h.raw, TP_STATUS_IN_PROGRESS);
> > +
> > po->stats.stats1.tp_packets++;
> > if (copy_skb) {
> > status |= TP_STATUS_COPY;
>
> This patch looks correct. Please resend it with proper signed-off-by
> and with a kernel code indenting style (tabs). Is this bug present
> since the beginning of af_packet and multiqueue devices or did it get
> introduced in some previous kernel?
Sorry about the tabs, I'll fix that and try to figure out what I did wrong with
the signed-off-by.
I've looked back as far as I could find online (2.6.11) and it would appear that
this bug has always been there.
Thanks, jon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-04 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-03 21:55 [RFC PATCH] packet: mark ring entry as in-use inside spin_lock to prevent RX ring overrun Jon Rosen
2018-04-03 23:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-04 14:34 ` Jon Rosen (jrosen) [this message]
2018-04-04 13:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-04 14:59 ` Jon Rosen (jrosen)
2018-04-04 21:44 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-04-04 22:31 ` Jon Rosen (jrosen)
2018-05-19 12:25 ` Jon Rosen (jrosen)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54c7cbde468c45609e36738baa5ea084@XCH-RTP-016.cisco.com \
--to=jrosen@cisco.com \
--cc=bpoirier@suse.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dwindsor@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maloney@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rami.rosen@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox