From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frederic@kernel.org, jstultz@google.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, vschneid@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] sched: dynamic: Simplify PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 10:00:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54d24191-efd1-418d-92df-20ca6d385675@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703133358.698078-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Hi Mark,
On 7/3/26 7:03 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> All architectures which currently suppoort PREEMPT_DYNAMIC select
> ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY. On architectures which select
> ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY, it has not been possible to select the NONE and
> VOLUNTARY preemption models since v7.0 due to commit:
>
> 7dadeaa6e851 ("sched: Further restrict the preemption modes")
>
> Hence in practice PREEMPT_DYNAMIC no longer supports the NONE or
> VOLUNTARY preemption models.
>
> This series makes the de-facto situation official by making
> PREEMPT_DYNAMIC depend on ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY, and removing all the
> redundant code.
This cleanup looks good indeed. little bit more cleanup can be added,
details of it at the end.
>
> For x86_64 v7.2-rc1 defconfig built with GCC 10.2.1, this makes the
> bzImage 28K smaller, mostly due to removing NOPs that will never be
> patched to {cond,might}_resched() at runtime:
>
> [mark@lakrids:~/src/linux]% ls -al vmlinux-*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 mark mark 53844952 Jul 3 14:09 vmlinux-after
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 mark mark 53842856 Jul 3 14:09 vmlinux-before
Is this reversed? How come vmlinux is more whereas bzImage is less?
> [mark@lakrids:~/src/linux]% ls -al bzImage-*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 mark mark 14771200 Jul 3 14:09 bzImage-after
> -rw-r--r-- 1 mark mark 14799872 Jul 3 14:08 bzImage-before
>
> Mark.
>
> Mark Rutland (5):
> sched: dynamic: Make PREEMPT_DYNAMIC depend on ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY
> sched: dynamic: Simplify {cond,might}_resched()
> sched: dynamic: Simplify preempt_schedule{,_notrace}()
> sched: dynamic: Simplify irqentry_exit_cond_resched()
> sched: dynamic: Remove HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_{CALL,KEY}
>
> arch/Kconfig | 38 -------
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h | 10 --
> arch/loongarch/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/preempt.h | 7 --
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h | 11 --
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h | 28 -----
> include/asm-generic/preempt.h | 10 --
> include/linux/irq-entry-common.h | 17 +--
> include/linux/kernel.h | 20 ----
> include/linux/sched.h | 31 +----
> kernel/Kconfig.preempt | 9 +-
> kernel/entry/common.c | 17 +--
> kernel/sched/core.c | 176 +----------------------------
> 18 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 367 deletions(-)
>
Btw, I ran it on powerpc, builds and boots.
Bloat-o-meter says,
Total: Before=32286154, After=32267870, chg -0.06%
In addition,
I think you can also remove accessor methods of none, voluntary.
I see preempt_model_none is used. (Though one may question its usage there).
That wrapper can be outside of #ifdef as preempt dynamic can't choose
none/voluntary.
---
diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h
index d964f965c8ff..b4dd4fc13cf8 100644
--- a/include/linux/preempt.h
+++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
@@ -469,22 +469,9 @@ DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(preempt, preempt_disable(), preempt_enable())
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(preempt_notrace, preempt_disable_notrace(), preempt_enable_notrace())
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
-
-extern bool preempt_model_none(void);
-extern bool preempt_model_voluntary(void);
extern bool preempt_model_full(void);
extern bool preempt_model_lazy(void);
-
#else
-
-static inline bool preempt_model_none(void)
-{
- return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE);
-}
-static inline bool preempt_model_voluntary(void)
-{
- return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY);
-}
static inline bool preempt_model_full(void)
{
return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT);
@@ -494,9 +481,16 @@ static inline bool preempt_model_lazy(void)
{
return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY);
}
-
#endif
+static inline bool preempt_model_none(void)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE);
+}
+static inline bool preempt_model_voluntary(void)
+{
+ return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY);
+}
static inline bool preempt_model_rt(void)
{
return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 9eb279eade26..59a8c8e63ca1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7815,8 +7815,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_rwlock_write);
enum {
preempt_dynamic_undefined = -1,
- preempt_dynamic_none,
- preempt_dynamic_voluntary,
preempt_dynamic_full,
preempt_dynamic_lazy,
};
@@ -7901,8 +7899,6 @@ static void __init preempt_dynamic_init(void)
} \
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(preempt_model_##mode)
-PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(none);
-PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(voluntary);
PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(full);
PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(lazy);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 13:33 [PATCH 0/5] sched: dynamic: Simplify PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mark Rutland
2026-07-03 13:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched: dynamic: Make PREEMPT_DYNAMIC depend on ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY Mark Rutland
2026-07-06 4:36 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-03 13:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched: dynamic: Simplify {cond,might}_resched() Mark Rutland
2026-07-06 4:59 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-03 13:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched: dynamic: Simplify preempt_schedule{,_notrace}() Mark Rutland
2026-07-06 5:19 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-03 13:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched: dynamic: Simplify irqentry_exit_cond_resched() Mark Rutland
2026-07-06 4:42 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-03 13:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched: dynamic: Remove HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_{CALL,KEY} Mark Rutland
2026-07-06 4:30 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54d24191-efd1-418d-92df-20ca6d385675@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox