From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752795AbbCKSLy (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:11:54 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:47636 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752484AbbCKSLw (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:11:52 -0400 Message-ID: <55008557.3000200@suse.de> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:11:35 -0500 From: Alexander Graf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Schwab CC: Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Michael Matz , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , =?windows-1252?Q?Dirk_M=FCller?= , Suravee Suthikulanit Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Enable CONFIG_COMPAT also for 64k page size References: <1417707993-82290-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <2583329.jVX0TanYzO@wuerfel> <550062D6.3000101@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11.03.15 11:09, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Alexander Graf writes: > >> Andreas, would you like to send this upstream as a proper top-level >> patch or would you prefer if I do a patch set with the 2 patches (enable >> CONFIG_COMPAT on 64k PAGE_SIZE and your patch)? > > They only make sense in combination, so go for the patch set. Ok, can you please give me a signed-off-by line for your patch then? :) Alex