From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752909AbbCKWga (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:36:30 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:36761 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750779AbbCKWg1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:36:27 -0400 Message-ID: <5500C352.2060104@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:36:02 -0400 From: Sasha Levin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton CC: Johannes Weiner , Dave Chinner , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Wu Fengguang , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Linux API Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move away from non-failing small allocations References: <1426107294-21551-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <1426107294-21551-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/11/2015 04:54 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > The second patch is the first step in the transition plan. It changes > the default but it is NOT an upstream material. It is aimed for brave > testers who can cope with failures. I have talked to Andrew and he > was willing to keep that patch in mmotm tree. It would be even better > to have this in linux-next because the testing coverage would be even > bigger. Dave Chinner has also shown an interest to integrate this into > his xfstest farm. It would be great if Fenguang could add it into the > zero testing project too (if the pushing the patch into linux-next > would be too controversial). Stuff in mmotm automatically end up in linux-next. Thanks, Sasha