From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756752AbbCMQgY (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:36:24 -0400 Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.243]:12982 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756500AbbCMQgT (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:36:19 -0400 Message-ID: <550311FA.9000908@atmel.com> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:36:10 +0100 From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: atmel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Lezcano , Alexandre Belloni , Guenter Roeck , Lee Jones CC: Boris Brezillon , "Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard" , Wim Van Sebroeck , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Atmel System Timer cleanups References: <1426162054-9987-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <5502BA89.8020100@linaro.org> <20150313103329.GF4329@piout.net> <5502BD17.6030509@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <5502BD17.6030509@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.161.30.18] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 13/03/2015 11:33, Daniel Lezcano a écrit : > On 03/13/2015 11:33 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >> On 13/03/2015 at 11:23:05 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote : >>> On 03/12/2015 01:07 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >>>> This patch set cleans up the system timer driver. >>>> >>>> The main goal is to get rid of the mach/ headers dependency. At the same time, >>>> it introduces proper probing and locking (using a regmap) for the watchdog >>>> driver. >>>> >>>> This is based on 4.0-rc1 and will have two merge conflicts with my cleanup #1 in >>>> mach-at91/at91rm9200.c >>>> >>>> It also needs this patch to probe the watchdog properly: >>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/327274.html >>> >>> >>> Hi Alexandre, >>> >>> through which tree do you want this patchset to be merged ? >>> >> >> I'd say through the at91 tree as I have another series that depend on >> that one > > Ok. Absolutely. To the whole series: Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre And I stack it on at91-4.1-cleanup right now. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre