From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757382AbbCMQwf (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:52:35 -0400 Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.243]:15446 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756893AbbCMQwd (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:52:33 -0400 Message-ID: <550315C7.7010403@atmel.com> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:52:23 +0100 From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: atmel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandre Belloni , Lee Jones CC: Daniel Lezcano , Boris Brezillon , , , Wim Van Sebroeck , "Guenter Roeck" , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: syscon: Add atmel system timer registers definition References: <1426162054-9987-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <1426162054-9987-3-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <20150313080315.GC3383@x1> <20150313104032.GG4329@piout.net> In-Reply-To: <20150313104032.GG4329@piout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.161.30.18] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 13/03/2015 11:40, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : > Hi, > > On 13/03/2015 at 08:03:15 +0000, Lee Jones wrote : >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >> >>> AT91RM920 has a memory range reserved for timer and watchdog configuration. >>> Expose those registers so that drivers can make use of the system timer syscon >>> declared in at91 DTs. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni >>> Acked-by: Lee Jones >>> --- >>> include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-st.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-st.h >> >> Applied, thanks. > Actually, I was thinking this could go through the at91 to avoid > depending on your branch. Lee, I was planning to take the whole series with me to limit the number of merge conflicts and dependencies. Do you mind if I take this patch with the other AT91 cleanup patches through the arm-soc tree? If you are okay, can you remove this patch already applied on your tree? Thanks, bye. -- Nicolas Ferre