From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754588AbbCMVbO (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:31:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:38537 "EHLO mail-wg0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751911AbbCMVbL (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:31:11 -0400 Message-ID: <5503571D.9000703@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:31:09 +0100 From: Daniel Lezcano User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Herring CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Catalin Marinas , Arnd Bergmann , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , lina.iyer@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: cpuidle: Unify the ARM64/ARM DT approach References: <1425385777-14766-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <5501A1DE.9020804@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/13/2015 09:51 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Daniel Lezcano > wrote: >> >> Catalin, Rob, >> >> do you agree with this patchset ? > > There's very little to do with DT, but looks fine to me. Shall I consider as a acked-by for the entire patchset or only the DT part ? Thanks for taking the time to look at the patches. -- Daniel -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog