From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932790AbbCQJJc (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:09:32 -0400 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:38154 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754136AbbCQJJa (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:09:30 -0400 Message-ID: <5507EF42.6000202@ti.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:39:22 +0530 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Axel Lin CC: Yaniv Gardi , Dov Levenglick , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: qcom-ufs: Catch devm_phy_create failure in ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe References: <1425344755.4315.1.camel@phoenix> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 17 March 2015 06:17 AM, Axel Lin wrote: > 2015-03-03 9:05 GMT+08:00 Axel Lin : >> Current code does NULL test against return value of ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe. >> However, in the case of devm_phy_create() failure, ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe >> does not return NULL. Fix it. > Hi Kishon, > Seems this patch is missed. > Should I resend it? not necessary, I have the patch with me. Thanks Kishon