From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755476AbbCRKJz (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 06:09:55 -0400 Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:45164 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754074AbbCRKJw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 06:09:52 -0400 Message-ID: <55094EED.6060804@arm.com> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:09:49 +0000 From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Deacon CC: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Nicolas Pitre , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Kukjin Kim , Abhilash Kesavan , Arnd Bergmann , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Liviu Dudau , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Olof Johansson , Pawel Moll , Punit Agrawal , Sudeep Holla , Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/5] arm-cci400: PMU monitoring support on ARM64 References: <1426000735-14375-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> <20150317185449.GF8399@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20150317185449.GF8399@arm.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Mar 2015 10:09:49.0377 (UTC) FILETIME=[AB165B10:01D06163] X-MC-Unique: 115031810095000401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 17/03/15 18:54, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:18:50PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: >> From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" >> >> This series enables the PMU monitoring support for CCI400 on ARM64. >> The existing CCI400 driver code is a mix of PMU driver and the MCPM >> driver code. The MCPM driver is only used on ARM(32) and contains >> arm32 assembly and hence can't be built on ARM64. This patch splits >> the code to >> >> - ARM_CCI400_PORT_CTRL driver - depends on ARM && V7 >> - ARM_CCI400_PMU driver > > If you repost this with acks added and my feedback addressed, then I'm > happy to put together a branch for arm-soc along with your other CCI PMU > fix for event validation. Sure, I will do that. Thanks Suzuki > > Will >