From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755563AbbCRPpf (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:45:35 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:10688 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750896AbbCRPpe (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:45:34 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,423,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="700503648" Message-ID: <55099D9D.7000005@intel.com> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:45:33 -0700 From: Dave Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konstantin Khlebnikov CC: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: protect suid binaries against rowhammer with copy-on-read mappings References: <20150318083040.7838.76933.stgit@zurg> <550987AD.8020409@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/18/2015 08:08 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > It seems the only option is memory zoning: kernel should allocate all > normal memory for userspace from isolated area which is kept far far > away from important data. Yeah, except that the kernel has a pretty hard time telling which data is important.