From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752239AbbCWJfR (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 05:35:17 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]:36152 "EHLO mail-we0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752033AbbCWJfO (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 05:35:14 -0400 From: Duncan Sands X-Google-Original-From: Duncan Sands Message-ID: <550FDE4E.30201@free.fr> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:35:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar CC: Michael Sullivan , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Steven Rostedt , lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org, Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Alternative to signals/sys_membarrier() in liburcu References: <867044376.285926.1426172227750.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <666590480.287502.1426193588471.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1601505044.287659.1426199435904.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20150313080743.GA21156@gmail.com> <20150313141853.GE5412@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20150313141853.GE5412@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So, given the fact that the userspace RCU library does now see > some real-world use, is it now time for Mathieu to resubmit his > sys_membarrier() patch? I'm using userspace RCU with success in financial software, so the LTTng project isn't the only user. It works well, but it's not as fast as I'd like. My profiling shows that the performance hit is coming from the memory barriers. So I would very much like to see sys_membarrier go in. Best wishes, Duncan.