From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753016AbbCWS2k (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:28:40 -0400 Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:36022 "EHLO mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752508AbbCWS2g (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:28:36 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-b7fc86d0000066b7-af-55105b51e4f5 Message-id: <55105B4A.4050903@samsung.com> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 19:28:26 +0100 From: Sylwester Nawrocki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Lee Jones Cc: Pavel Machek , Jacek Anaszewski , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, cooloney@gmail.com, rpurdie@rpsys.net, sakari.ailus@iki.fi, Andrzej Hajda , Chanwoo Choi Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v13 04/13] DT: Add documentation for the mfd Maxim max77693 References: <1426175114-14876-1-git-send-email-j.anaszewski@samsung.com> <1426175114-14876-5-git-send-email-j.anaszewski@samsung.com> <20150323120743.GG24422@x1> <20150323142202.GA23919@amd> <20150323150213.GN24804@x1> <20150323154807.GA13297@amd> <20150323155937.GQ24804@x1> In-reply-to: <20150323155937.GQ24804@x1> Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xy7qB0QKhBldu81rcWneO1eLozolM Fte/PGe1mH8EyO29+pzR4mzTG3aL+1+PMlpc3jWHzWLrm3WMFj0btrJa3D11lM1i966nrBZn 9q9kc+D12DnrLrvH4a8LWTzuXNvD5rFn/g9Wj74tqxg9Vqz+zu7xeZNcAHsUl01Kak5mWWqR vl0CV8bBrU9ZCx5zVayYsImlgXEuRxcjJ4eEgInEkw3PGCFsMYkL99azdTFycQgJLGWU2LD9 KJTziVHi2/+NrCBVvAJaEj/3TGQHsVkEVCUWNB8C62YTMJToPdoHZosKREicvLuHHaJeUOLH 5HssXYwcHCICKhLn3piDzGQWeM0ksaPrB9hMYYFQiTs3G9ghls1mkng8+zMzSIJTQENi+86F YM3MAuoSU6bkgoSZBeQlNq95yzyBUWAWkhWzEKpmIalawMi8ilE0tTS5oDgpPddIrzgxt7g0 L10vOT93EyMkar7uYFx6zOoQowAHoxIPb0Q9f6gQa2JZcWXuIUYJDmYlEd5YF4FQId6UxMqq 1KL8+KLSnNTiQ4xMHJxSDYy786qtfFqNGL1TplrwtsaL7fhzX3pl5INzj5jsfdMeetgxPXUt lYs79aeb21pgyoPFRo461ivieP56FxyKWtXE/aQl0FN6jtXKPd94v8q90FltJtF76Ydrv92H Q69f7m0xYnPYzWJ9TfOU5RWFY/HfOB7cPpHx/0Ndhdy6iTsnFd+KNJAN/KbEUpyRaKjFXFSc CADlX8VDeAIAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23/03/15 16:59, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Pavel Machek wrote: > >> > On Mon 2015-03-23 15:02:13, Lee Jones wrote: >>> > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Pavel Machek wrote: >>>> > > > On Mon 2015-03-23 12:07:43, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>> > > > > This patch requires a DT Ack. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > No, it requires DT people to be notified -- and they were, few times >>>> > > > by now. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > They clearly don't care. >>> > > >>> > > Well fortunately for the Kernel community, I do care. And as this >>> > > patch adds 3 new DT properties, has been through many iterations >>> > > already with vast changes made over that period and there is still >>> > > some controversy looming, I'm saying that it _does_ require a DT >>> > > Ack. >> > >> > Can you help get that ack, then? As a maintainer, you have better >> > chance getting reply from DT people than patch submitter. > > Hopefully they will see my plea a couple of replies back. > > If that fails I'll go poke them via other means. Failing that I'll go > see them in person and continually hit them with wet fish until one of > them relents. Nice, as we can see it doesn't take _that_ much to be a really good subsystem maintainer. I wish you good luck and hope there will be no need to realize the very last steps of that clever plan. -- Regards, Sylwester