From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752926AbbCYQaT (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:30:19 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f41.google.com ([209.85.192.41]:36525 "EHLO mail-qg0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752883AbbCYQaN (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:30:13 -0400 Message-ID: <5512E288.4020703@hurleysoftware.com> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:30:00 -0400 From: Peter Hurley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NeilBrown CC: Mark Rutland , One Thousand Gnomes , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sebastian Reichel , Pavel Machek , Grant Likely , Jiri Slaby , GTA04 owners , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] TTY: add support for tty_slave devices. References: <20150318055437.21025.13990.stgit@notabene.brown> <20150318055831.21025.85317.stgit@notabene.brown> In-Reply-To: <20150318055831.21025.85317.stgit@notabene.brown> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/18/2015 01:58 AM, NeilBrown wrote: > + * A "tty-slave" is a device permanently attached to a particularly > + * tty, typically wired to a UART. Why "permanently"? Is that a limitation of the implementation or design? Regards, Peter Hurley