From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752071AbbCYWMQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:12:16 -0400 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:57038 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751261AbbCYWMO (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:12:14 -0400 Message-ID: <55133294.4040705@ti.com> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:41:32 +0530 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arun Ramamurthy , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Arnd Bergmann , CC: , , , Dmitry Torokhov , Anatol Pomazau , Jonathan Richardson , Scott Branden , Ray Jui , Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] phy: phy-core: allow specifying supply at port level References: <1426886727-537-1-git-send-email-arun.ramamurthy@broadcom.com> <1426886727-537-2-git-send-email-arun.ramamurthy@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <1426886727-537-2-git-send-email-arun.ramamurthy@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Saturday 21 March 2015 02:55 AM, Arun Ramamurthy wrote: > Multi-port phy's may have per-port power supplies. Let's change phy core > to first attempt to look up the supply at the port level, and then, if > not found, check parent device. Why not just have every port provide the power supply if it needs? I don't think checking for parent device should be present in the phy-core at all. Thanks Kishon