From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752249AbbCZABq (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:01:46 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:60012 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751185AbbCZABo (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:01:44 -0400 Message-ID: <55134C3E.4060400@ti.com> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 05:31:02 +0530 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Torokhov CC: Arun Ramamurthy , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Arnd Bergmann , , , , , Anatol Pomazau , Jonathan Richardson , Scott Branden , Ray Jui Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] phy: cygnus-usbphy: Add Broadcom Cygnus USB phy driver References: <1426886727-537-1-git-send-email-arun.ramamurthy@broadcom.com> <1426886727-537-4-git-send-email-arun.ramamurthy@broadcom.com> <551336A2.1050704@ti.com> <20150325224253.GA16950@dtor-ws> In-Reply-To: <20150325224253.GA16950@dtor-ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 26 March 2015 04:12 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Kishon, > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 03:58:50AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Saturday 21 March 2015 02:55 AM, Arun Ramamurthy wrote: >>> +struct bcm_phy_driver { >>> + void __iomem *usbphy_regs; >>> + void __iomem *usb2h_idm_regs; >>> + void __iomem *usb2d_idm_regs; >>> + struct bcm_phy_instance *ports[MAX_PHY_PORTS]; >> >> er.. can't we allocate this dynamically? > > The chip has support for only 3 phys, so I believe allocating array of 3 > pointers is simplest. > > [...] > >>> + >>> +static struct phy *bcm_usb_phy_xlate(struct device *dev, >>> + struct of_phandle_args *args) >>> +{ >>> + struct bcm_phy_driver *phy_driver = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>> + struct bcm_phy_instance *port = NULL; >>> + int i; >>> + >>> + if (!phy_driver) >>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >>> + >>> + if (WARN_ON(args->args_count != 1)) >>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >>> + >>> + if (WARN_ON(args->args[0] < 0 || args->args[0] > 1)) >>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >>> + >>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(phy_driver->ports); i++) { >>> + struct bcm_phy_instance *p = phy_driver->ports[i]; >>> + >>> + if (p && p->generic_phy->dev.of_node == args->np) { >>> + port = p; >>> + break; >>> + } >>> + } >>> + >>> + if (!port) { >>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to locate phy %s\n", args->np->name); >>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >>> + } >>> + >>> + port->host_mode = args->args[0]; >>> + >>> + return port->generic_phy; >>> +} >> >> The xlate function here shouldn't be needed at all. Use of_phy_simple_xlate >> instead. > > of_phy_simple_xlate() will not allow specifying host vs device mode when > requesting phy though... indeed! -Kishon