From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/urgent] timers/tick/broadcast-hrtimer: Fix suspicious RCU usage in idle loop
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:18:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55138184.3000801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tip-a127d2bcf1fbc8c8e0b5cf0dab54f7d3ff50ce47@git.kernel.org>
Hi,
Can you please add stable@vger.kernel.org to the Cc?
Without the patch, we get RCU warnings during bootup.
Hence the patch is important for the stable kernels as well.
Regards
Preeti U Murthy
On 03/23/2015 05:54 PM, tip-bot for Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Commit-ID: a127d2bcf1fbc8c8e0b5cf0dab54f7d3ff50ce47
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a127d2bcf1fbc8c8e0b5cf0dab54f7d3ff50ce47
> Author: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> AuthorDate: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:19:27 +0530
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> CommitDate: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:50:05 +0100
>
> timers/tick/broadcast-hrtimer: Fix suspicious RCU usage in idle loop
>
> The hrtimer mode of broadcast queues hrtimers in the idle entry
> path so as to wakeup cpus in deep idle states. The associated
> call graph is :
>
> cpuidle_idle_call()
> |____ clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER, ....))
> |_____tick_broadcast_set_event()
> |____clockevents_program_event()
> |____bc_set_next()
>
> The hrtimer_{start/cancel} functions call into tracing which uses RCU.
> But it is not legal to call into RCU in cpuidle because it is one of the
> quiescent states. Hence protect this region with RCU_NONIDLE which informs
> RCU that the cpu is momentarily non-idle.
>
> As an aside it is helpful to point out that the clock event device that is
> programmed here is not a per-cpu clock device; it is a
> pseudo clock device, used by the broadcast framework alone.
> The per-cpu clock device programming never goes through bc_set_next().
>
> Signed-off-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150318104705.17763.56668.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.com
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
> index eb682d5..6aac4be 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static void bc_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode,
> */
> static int bc_set_next(ktime_t expires, struct clock_event_device *bc)
> {
> + int bc_moved;
> /*
> * We try to cancel the timer first. If the callback is on
> * flight on some other cpu then we let it handle it. If we
> @@ -60,9 +61,15 @@ static int bc_set_next(ktime_t expires, struct clock_event_device *bc)
> * restart the timer because we are in the callback, but we
> * can set the expiry time and let the callback return
> * HRTIMER_RESTART.
> + *
> + * Since we are in the idle loop at this point and because
> + * hrtimer_{start/cancel} functions call into tracing,
> + * calls to these functions must be bound within RCU_NONIDLE.
> */
> - if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&bctimer) >= 0) {
> - hrtimer_start(&bctimer, expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED);
> + RCU_NONIDLE(bc_moved = (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&bctimer) >= 0) ?
> + !hrtimer_start(&bctimer, expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED) :
> + 0);
> + if (bc_moved) {
> /* Bind the "device" to the cpu */
> bc->bound_on = smp_processor_id();
> } else if (bc->bound_on == smp_processor_id()) {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-26 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-18 10:49 [PATCH V2] tick/broadcast-hrtimer : Fix suspicious RCU usage in idle loop Preeti U Murthy
2015-03-23 12:24 ` [tip:timers/urgent] timers/tick/broadcast-hrtimer: " tip-bot for Preeti U Murthy
2015-03-26 3:48 ` Preeti U Murthy [this message]
2015-03-29 7:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-30 10:26 ` Luis Henriques
2015-04-17 13:12 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55138184.3000801@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).