From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932149AbbC0Ohy (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:37:54 -0400
Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:35922 "EHLO
	mail-pd0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932118AbbC0Ohs (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:37:48 -0400
Message-ID: <55156B28.9030802@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 22:37:28 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
        "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] minor cleanups for ACPI processor driver
References: <1427464513-14414-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20150327140336.GG1562@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150327140336.GG1562@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Will,

On 2015年03月27日 22:03, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hanjun,
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 01:55:04PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> This patch set are some minor cleanups for ACPI processor driver
>> to address the comments which raised by Rafael in ARM64 ACPI core
>> patches, so this patch set is on top of ARM64 ACPI core patches
>> the git tree is
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
>> branch for-next/acpi.
>>
>> Rafael, I assume this patchset will be taken with your tree if
>> it makes sense, any rebase work needed please let me know.
>>
>> the last patch - ACPI / processor: Introduce invalid_phys_cpuid()
>> will cut u64 mpidr to int, but I think it is ok for error values,
>> correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> I appreciate that you probably have a bunch of code building on top of
> the series that's in linux-next, but sending it out at the moment is
> hugely confusing -- particularly when this is targetting an independent
> tree. If you have patches for 4.2, please can you wait until after the
> merge window before posting for review?

OK, thanks for the reminding, I didn't mean any confusion but actually
I did, sorry for that.

>
> Right now most maintainers are probably trying to stabilise their current
> queues, so the most helpful thing you can do is test linux-next and send
> fixes for any issues you find there.

Sure, I will test linux-next on ARM64 platforms and x86 too.

>
> It doesn't help that the series you posted seems to include two patch
> series (n/7 and n/2).

oh, side effects of staying up all night for the firmware mini-summit,
please take those two patches for ARM64 ACPI if it is OK to you.

Thanks
Hanjun