From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>, Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
Cc: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>,
reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ewald.peiszer@gmx.at, matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Boot failure: msdos pushes in front of reiserfs
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:21:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <551760000.1011039675@tiny> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020114104242.M26688@lynx.adilger.int>
In-Reply-To: <20020113223803.GA28085@emma1.emma.line.org> <20020114095013.A4760@namesys.com> <3C42BE0E.2090902@namesys.com> <20020114143650.D828@namesys.com> <20020114104242.M26688@lynx.adilger.int>
On Monday, January 14, 2002 10:42:42 AM -0700 Andreas Dilger
<adilger@turbolabs.com> wrote:
>> We can use both:
>> destroy MSDOS superblock (if any) at mkreiserfs (or don't touch 1st
>> block of the device if there is no msdos superblock).
>> And link reiserfs code into the kernel earlier than msdos code.
>
> Hmm, I could have sworn I submitted patches already which did both of these
> things. In general, it is perfectly safe to zero the bootsector of a
> partition when you mkfs it (mke2fs has been doing this for a long time).
> If you mkfs your boot partition (and zap the bootblock) you would have to
> run LILO on it anyways after they install a new kernel, because the
> location of the kernel would change.
Hmmm mke2fs seems to always zero out the first 1024, except on sparcs (when
ZAP_BOOT_BLOCK not defined). I thought alphas stored the partition table on
the first block of the first partition as well, and that we didn't want to
zero it then.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-14 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-13 22:38 Boot failure: msdos pushes in front of reiserfs Matthias Andree
2002-01-14 6:50 ` [reiserfs-list] " Oleg Drokin
2002-01-14 11:16 ` Hans Reiser
2002-01-14 11:36 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-01-14 17:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-01-14 19:46 ` Hans Reiser
2002-01-14 20:21 ` Andrew Clausen
2002-01-14 20:21 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2002-01-14 20:29 ` Andrew Clausen
2002-01-14 14:00 ` Matthias Andree
2002-01-14 14:30 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-01-15 17:47 ` Matthias Andree
2002-01-17 6:38 ` Oleg Drokin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=551760000.1011039675@tiny \
--to=mason@suse.com \
--cc=adilger@turbolabs.com \
--cc=ewald.peiszer@gmx.at \
--cc=green@namesys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox