From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf script segfault
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 07:36:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <551AA2F8.9080205@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150331125920.GE9438@kernel.org>
On 3/31/15 6:59 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:45:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:51:34PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
>>> tool was moved to ordered_events and is not initialized for pipe mode. I
>>> don't have time to look into it more than that before PTO on Wednesday.
>
>> I guess this one is enough, no? Checking with your example...
>
> So the following is better, can you give it a try, please?
>
> - Arnaldo
>
>
> From fbd7d154f01c47db71a3d8b0546911872aa1de54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:53:50 -0300
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] perf session: Always initialize ordered_events
>
> Even when it is not used to actually reorder events, some of its fields
> are used, like session->ordered_events->tool, to shorten function
> signatures where tool, for instance, was being passed, as the tool is
> needed for the ordered_events code, we need it there and might as well
> use it for other perf_session needs.
>
> This fixes a problem where 'perf script' had some condition that made
> session->ordered_events not to be initialized even with its
> script->tool ordered_events related flags asking for it to be, which
> looks like another bug and needs to be investigated further.
>
> Always initializing session->ordered_events at least leaves the current
> assumptions in place, so do it now.
>
> Reported-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-b1xxk0rwkz2a0gip1uufmjqg@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/session.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> index adf0740c563b..89c66797abe4 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ struct perf_session *perf_session__new(struct perf_data_file *file,
>
> session->repipe = repipe;
> machines__init(&session->machines);
> + ordered_events__init(&session->ordered_events, &session->machines,
> + session->evlist, tool, ordered_events__deliver_event);
>
> if (file) {
> if (perf_data_file__open(file))
> @@ -139,9 +141,6 @@ struct perf_session *perf_session__new(struct perf_data_file *file,
> tool->ordered_events && !perf_evlist__sample_id_all(session->evlist)) {
> dump_printf("WARNING: No sample_id_all support, falling back to unordered processing\n");
> tool->ordered_events = false;
> - } else {
> - ordered_events__init(&session->ordered_events, &session->machines,
> - session->evlist, tool, ordered_events__deliver_event);
> }
>
> return session;
>
Works for me. Reviewed-and-Tested-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-31 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-30 22:51 [BUG] perf script segfault David Ahern
2015-03-30 23:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 12:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 13:36 ` David Ahern [this message]
2015-04-07 23:41 ` David Ahern
2015-04-07 23:49 ` David Ahern
2015-03-31 13:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-03-31 14:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 14:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-03-31 14:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 14:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 15:48 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-03-31 15:50 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-03-31 16:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 16:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 16:26 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=551AA2F8.9080205@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox