From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753887AbbDAOpy (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:45:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60849 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753357AbbDAOpv (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:45:51 -0400 Message-ID: <551C0499.9050904@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:45:45 -0400 From: Rik van Riel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jens Axboe , Marcelo Tosatti CC: axboe@kernel.org, fweisbec@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] nohz,blk-mq: do not create blk-mq workqueues on nohz dedicated CPUs References: <20150331102726.076a6860@annuminas.surriel.com> <20150331231700.GB4161@amt.cnet> <551C0273.2030004@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: <551C0273.2030004@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/01/2015 10:36 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > That wont work for blk-mq, we rely on the characteristics of bound > workqueues. So it would have to be handled up front, like in the patch I > sent out. Your patch from yesterday looks good. I'll take it for a spin today (had some other stuff on my plate yesterday).