From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: Add simple read disturb test
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:18:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <551D6BDA.6000606@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150402160451.GF32500@ld-irv-0074>
Am 02.04.2015 um 18:04 schrieb Brian Norris:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 04:13:46PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> This simple MTD tests allows the user to see when read disturb happens.
>> By reading blocks over and over it reports flipped bits.
>> Currently it reports only flipped bits of the worst page of a block.
>> If within block X page P1 has 3 bit flips and P6 4, it will report 4.
>> By default every 50th block is read.
>
> Didn't read through this much yet, but why do we need another in-kernel
> test that coul (AFAICT) be easily replicated in userspace? The same goes
> for several of the other tests, I think, actually. But at least with
> those, we have a history of keeping them around, so it's not too much
> burden [1].
I've added the test to drivers/mtd/tests/ because it fits into.
As simple as that.
> Brian
>
> [1] Although there are some latent issues in these tests that are still
> getting get worked out (e.g., bad handling of 64-bit casting; too large
> of stacks; uninterruptibility). The latter two would not even exist if
> we were in user space.
uninterruptibility got solved by my "[PATCH] mtd: Make MTD tests cancelable" patch.
But if we want to kill drivers/mtd/tests/ I'll happily help out.
Where shall we move these tests into? mtd-utils?
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-02 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-02 14:13 [PATCH] mtd: Add simple read disturb test Richard Weinberger
2015-04-02 14:32 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-04-02 14:33 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-02 14:45 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-04-02 14:56 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-02 15:03 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-04-02 15:19 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-02 15:29 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-02 15:02 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-04-02 15:18 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-02 16:04 ` Brian Norris
2015-04-02 16:18 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2015-04-03 5:19 ` Andrea Scian
2015-04-12 19:31 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-13 0:11 ` Brian Norris
2015-10-19 21:11 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-10-20 13:22 ` Ezequiel Garcia
[not found] <mailman.39315.1427996116.22890.linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=551D6BDA.6000606@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox