From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753017AbbDFJqE (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2015 05:46:04 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:52198 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751948AbbDFJqB (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2015 05:46:01 -0400 Message-ID: <552255C6.1050503@rempel-privat.de> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 11:45:42 +0200 From: Oleksij Rempel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Bolle CC: linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] pinctrl: Add driver for Alphascale asm9260 pinctrl References: <1427476243.2334.12.camel@x220> <1428215185-14190-1-git-send-email-linux@rempel-privat.de> <1428215185-14190-2-git-send-email-linux@rempel-privat.de> <1428306169.634.51.camel@x220> <55224604.8070009@rempel-privat.de> <1428313265.634.112.camel@x220> In-Reply-To: <1428313265.634.112.camel@x220> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7iKO4FDaHCl65tTCj7CKrohnKDIUUVa6g" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:On82laKzx4kXYoCMFZLTdWVbaXgwucKfD9yoT43hjpH+ijvQqow Cl3bnQVof6i6kWiw7n9PQt44V5SqfQZuU6zzoV4F9vumFzIPtIhBZNFg8xb6hpElXl0f5L7 Evy7Y3duTMmZ0jOGDM23eiH7mfUUkBZLCJjXukzTWU7co372L0hYdV6g18L1JntaLZNc3J+ ZETLOmdbldIohK2rrNxPA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --7iKO4FDaHCl65tTCj7CKrohnKDIUUVa6g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 06.04.2015 um 11:41 schrieb Paul Bolle: > On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 10:38 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> If you won't to say: "You have a mismatch between header and >> MODULE_LICENSE, please make sure it will match." >> You saying some thing like this: "I was right last time. Make module >> License like I saying." >=20 > No, that's not what I wrote. > >> I'm confuse, what is your actual point? Do you trying to prove some th= ing? >=20 > My point is that there's a mismatch between the license described in th= e > comment at the top of this file and the ident used in the > MODULE_LICENSE() macro. In my comments on v2 I wrote: > By the way, you probably want to use "GPL v2" as the license ident > [...]. >=20 > In this v3 I noticed the same mismatch (which was not surprising becaus= e > you already stated that "GPL" actually did match what's stated at the > comment in the top of this file). Therefor I wrote: > So only "GPL v2" matches what's found in the comment at top of this= > file. >=20 > There now seem to be a few options: > - change either the comment at the top of this file or the license iden= t > used in MODULE_LICENSE() to make them actually match; > - show that I misread the comment at top of this file; > - or show that my reading of module.h is incorrect. Ok, thank you for your review. i send new version of patch with fixing header license to "v2 and later".= > (Another option would be a patch that somehow merges the "GPL" and "GPL= > v2" license idents. That patch would put an end to discussions like the= > one we're having here. I'm _not_ volunteering to submit it.) >=20 > Thanks, >=20 >=20 > Paul Bolle >=20 --=20 Regards, Oleksij --7iKO4FDaHCl65tTCj7CKrohnKDIUUVa6g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlUiVdMACgkQHwImuRkmbWmF8wEAj9P71BI8l+82yIW8OF70we+M s4kbsxjGqy94Wdc6m/gA/0rtCtIG1kW6J7fUzlZJ3u+uj69+q6rRtaVn50gjCnjG =2Hi3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7iKO4FDaHCl65tTCj7CKrohnKDIUUVa6g--