From: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
To: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Zhiqiang Zhang <zhangzhiqiang.zhang@huawei.com>,
juri.lelli@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: correct definition of density as C_i/min{D_i,P_i}
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 11:48:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5523A7D7.80102@unitn.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150403214713.70e9614b@luca-1225C>
On 04/03/2015 09:47 PM, Luca Abeni wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:57:37 +0200
> Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us> wrote:
[...]
>> I realise that I've reviewed quite a lot of this, and I have some
>> vague memories of this being discussed earlier, Juri? Luca?
> I remember there was a discussion (and I seem to remember that the
> symbol used for the period was changed at least one time, but I might
> be wrong), but I do not remember the details.
>
> Next week I'll have some time for working on this; I'll search the old
> emails and I'll try to reconstruct the discussion.
Sorry, after searching in my old emails I've not been able to find
references to this particular topic (T_i vs P_i).
Maybe I lost some emails, or maybe I mis-remembered the old discussion...
Anyway, as I said I am fine with changing P_i in T_i if there is a general
agreement.
Luca
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-07 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-03 8:18 [PATCH] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: correct definition of density as C_i/min{D_i,P_i} Zhiqiang Zhang
2015-04-03 10:52 ` Luca Abeni
2015-04-08 9:31 ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-08 10:34 ` Luca Abeni
2015-04-03 17:57 ` Henrik Austad
2015-04-03 19:47 ` Luca Abeni
2015-04-07 9:48 ` Luca Abeni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5523A7D7.80102@unitn.it \
--to=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=henrik@austad.us \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zhangzhiqiang.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox